Argh

Again I’m at a point where I want to change the underlying system of my blog. I’ve felt from the beginning that this was just not “stable” enough for my needs. It would work at first, but then knowing myself I knew I would want a more complex structure than just a linear list of blog posts.

I think I’ve found a system that I could use, but I wouldn’t be able to edit it online. Check out TiddlyWiki. I know there are other wiki stuff out there which probably would work as well, as well as online, and I will look around for that. I don’t have my own server so I’ll have to find something that is compatible with my web hotel. Something I like with Tiddly is that it’s… very simple and slick. A standard wikipedia-style wiki feels dry, to me.

What is REALLY good with a wiki is that I can very easily change how I want to present the blog without having to know much html or any behind-the-scenes tweaking. I can also create what I have wanted a long time – sub blogs. Branches, not just one huge unmanagable blog. And don’t get me started on “tags clouds” and “categories” or whatever…

I mean, the “Barefoot Journals” was an attempt at a sub-blog, which I knew would become unmanagable. Once I have too many entries in it, it won’t work well. I also have to go in and tweak in html-code every time I try to add something just so that I get that clickable table of content list. With a wiki, I can design each page better, and using Tiddly the reader will be able to navigate much more easily.

I just have to make sure to somehow make my permalinks to the old blog point to a new system, if possible. Some day…

Anyhow. A new sub-post to the Barefoot Journal thing today and yesterday. I love that spring is finally here!

Morals have no place in the law

In a current debate, people are trying to create a law that is mostly based on the morals of the public, angled in a very black and white way by the media. Based on their or a common opinion and taste. To ban something because it is against a common ideal.

I found a good comparison to make it more clear what exactly morals mean when it comes to laws. Say for example that we have a discussion group somewhere, on or off the internet, it doesn’t really matter. Now someone states his opinion here, and someone else replies that “You are so stupid and wrong, can’t you see that?!” and some other people might even go in and say “Yeah, can’t you see how stupid you are? You are so wrong!”. Without any real arguments other than subjective opinions, these are simply morals. The problem here is that the one stating his opinion might as well be right, but no one cares because he is a minority and the others are a majority. It is a democracy, but one based on emotions rather than facts.

When you call something wrong only because it is immoral, you are making a looping argument. If you have no actual facts other than subjective opinions and feelings, then you state that it is against your morals because it is against your morals. That it is wrong to you (immoral) because it is immoral. Morality is not a fact, it is a feeling and an opinion, which do most oftenly vary from person to person, from country to country and from culture to culture.

For example, this may be the topic in such a group:

Someone: “Homosexuals don’t hurt anyone, therefore I think we should leave them alone.”

Reply 1: “What, that’s so sick! It will lead to the downfall of our society!”
Reply 2: “Gross! He is probably a fag himself! Don’t listen to him!”

Now, the first reply here says it’s “sick” (personal opinion unless that person is an educated psychologist or similar) and that it will “lead to the downfall of our society”. These are examples of very common reactions to things that people think are “morally wrong”, regardless really to what topic it involves. Let’s take a look at “lead to the downfall of our society” – this means that the replyer thinks that letting homosexual people live their lives without interfering will destroy (or begin to destroy) the image he has of the society, that is, his ideal image of the society. The facts are that, in this case, homosexuals ARE part of the society, but he doesn’t want them to be. The “downfall of the society” is the “downfall of his ideal image of the society”, based on his personal opinions and taste. In other words, his morals. So, in his eyes, homosexuality is wrong (immoral), because it is immoral. A very immature way of reasoning.

The other reply in the example mentions that it is “Gross!” (also a very common response) which means more or less the same as saying that it is “sick” or “disgusting” or “revolting”, etc. Solely subjective opinions based only on personal (or common) taste. Then another very common response is this; “He is probably a fag himself!”. This is called a “witch hunt”. Unless you are one of us, you are one of them. A very black and white way of seeing things. If you don’t agree completely with us, then you are our enemy. Then we have “Don’t listen to him!” which is a continuation of the “witch hunt”, really. If you are our enemy, then you have no say. We are a democratic people, but anyone as “obviously sick” as you are have no respect from us. Condensed, that means that “we let everyone speak, but not those that don’t think like us“.

Now, we can take plenty of other examples here. Instead of “homosexuality” we could take  “heterosexuality“, zoophilia, “being nude at home“, “transvestites“, “barefooting in public“, “eating tomatoes“, “singing in the rain“, or whatever, really. All fine examples; it depends on what group to which the discussion takes place and what the common opinion is there.

So, why then should morals have no place in the law?

Well, I am hoping that part of that answer is already clear to you after reading the text above.

A law is supposed to protect those subjects from harm that are directly affected by an event - not to protect others that have nothing to do with the event and are not directly affected by it. A law should not be made to protect one group’s ideal image of reality. A law should be based on actual facts, not popular feelings or taste.

Feelings, taste and morals are personal. They might be shared by many others, maybe even the majority of a group of people, but that won’t make them less subjective and it won’t turn them into facts.

This is what laws should be based on:

Facts, not fantasies.

Consistency, not double-standards.

Realism, not idealism.

The World is a Mess

The world is seriously a mess. To someone thinking rationally, observing how fellow humans work from a logical perspective, trying to weigh in views and different perspectives… the society becomes a illogical mess. But if that wasn’t enough, there are actually a huge group of people out there enforcing this mess, screaming in anger for anyone that disagrees. Here comes a little list of things and hints to remember if you are to live successful in this mess we call civilization.

Hint: It is politically incorrect to find feces or vomit disgusting without first evaluating the age of the individual excrementing or puking.

Hint: We must protect innocent minds from sexuality and bodily intimacy, by turning their attention to other stimuli such as humorous violence and revenge.

Hint: Animals are never to be seen as sexual beings, but the best way to describe unrestricted and uncomplicated sex is still to say that you fucked like animals.

Hint: We must suppress several natural body functions and then compensate for the lack of them with artificial, and in most cases highly commercial, means.

Hint: In the eyes of the same person, animals are innocent children on the one hand, and creatures worth no more than a cold knife to their throats on the other hand.

Hint: There is something wrong with you if you find a sound at over 100 decibel annoying or even slightly disturbing, depending on what the source of that sound is. Would it be a human baby, you would be sick to say anything. Would it be music at oftenly lower decibels, you would be entitled to call the police.

Hint: You should always be yourself, but don’t forget to conform.

The Day of Shame

The government of Sweden voted for the so called FRA-law, the 18th of June.

The majority voted yes.

The majority voted yes for constant surveillance of all Swedish citizens.

Internet, mobile phone, sms, radio waves, e-mail… everything, to be constantly monitored, 24/7, via automated search-scripts and living people.

…to be stored, if considered enough a “threat”.

A threat… to the national interests, among other similarily vague points.

So, anything that the government deem a threat… such as, say, software or music piracy… or anything, really. Since this actually happaned, turned from a crazy far-fetched bad sci-fi movie, then consider a less… foreigner-friendly party gains power the next time, or anyone else ready to use whatever power they get to get what they want.

Filtered out, stored, and used. Shared with other countries – why not – it’s for the safety of the people of Sweden.

How come, then, there were thousands of demonstrants outside the building as the vote progressed? How come then, that all the governing parties’ youth-groups protested? How come then, that on all online polls during the time, ~80-90% of the viewers voted No for the proposition?

They say it’s a protection against external threats to our country…

…when it’s in fact the greatest threat to our country today, but from within.

This is a day of shame, not only for Sweden, but for the entire free democratic world.

I’m deeply ashamed of living here, and supporting a system like this with my tax money.


Great respect to Camilla Lindberg, who was the only one brave enough to listen to the people and vote against her party. (she afterwards buckled to the pressure and changed her mind when new make-up, which didn’t really change the fact that all Swedish citizens will be constantly monitored, was applied) Also, thanks naturally to those who fought into the end of the debate to try to make the voters understand. The thing is, most probably understood, but felt forced. All while our prime minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt, went abroad for the evening to… watch football.



Here is the list
of all who voted. “Ja” means yes, “Nej” means no, “Frånvarande” means absent and “Avstår” means that he/she was present but didn’t vote. The list was posted for the public.

- Other links in Swedish:
StoppaFraLagen.nu (“Stop the FRA-law”, a sort of hub)
PolitikerBloggen.se (“Politician Blog”)
PiratPartiet (the only Swedish political party now fighting for both freedom, democracy and privacy)

Boycott GameSpot’s videos

I’ve always gone to Gamespot.com for when I have seen a game and want to know more about it. Gamespot’s reviews usually don’t differ much from my own opinions, and there is a lot of details in their reviews explaining what they like and didn’t like about a game. Knowing what I like and dislike very well personally, I can often find out whether I’d like a game or not before getting it myself.

(GameSpot.com is simply put a video game review site. They’ve tried to grow with an added community and blog systems and clubs and so on, but in essence they’re still simply a review site, where the staff reviews games and where the members also write reviews themselves.)

That’s all good, and just what a review site should be.

And of course, there is some advertisements here and there. A site needs to get money from somewhere, and I understand that completely, and since I’m not a paying premium member of the site, I probably get a bit more of the advertisement than those that pay.

Sometimes when I find a game, I know nothing about it. And in many cases, Gamespot haven’t yet come around to review it yet, and the only thing I can do is look at images from the game if there are any, or gameplay videos. Videos are a nice way of making a first “nah” or “this looks good” conclusion.

And… a little overkill I must say, when you look at a movie you get a pop-up window. In this window there is a list of other videos for the game you’re watching, and in the top right corner there is an ad. Whatever is in this ad is usually what you’ll see in the video area of the window, for a couple of 20-30 seconds, before the actual video you were supposed to see appears. Yes, advertisement gives the site funding to stay alive, naturally.

So, why do I say “boycott gamespot’s videos” then if it’s all fine and dandy?

It’s because when I click a game, mostly any game, and choose to watch a video, I’m usually greeted with a quite… perverted sort of advertisement.

There, for 20-30 seconds, I see an advertisement showing how great and wonderful it is to work in the American army. You see guns, you see missiles, you see tools of death. Real death. By a country that I simply didn’t like before because of their self-righteous nuke-em-all attitude leadership. Now, I get to see half a minute of propaganda, about how wonderful it would be for me (and I live in Sweden) to work for the US Navy or Airforce or whatever, and kill for them, and stand up for views that I find horrible and distorted.

Although I won’t discuss it in-depth here, I find their views horribly perverted, although in theory it sounds great. Freedom for all (who have enough money, and we’ll kill you if there are signs that you might stand in our way).

It just doesn’t make sense to me. I love to play games. And they find me, a guy living in Sweden who loves games, like a good target audience for war propaganda…?

I’ve seriously lost all respect for Gamespot after this. I still go there for a review or two, but are finding other just-as-good and more up-to-date sites for that as well. I know that it’s not Gamespot that made the propaganda movies, but it’s not like they don’t know and control what advertisements they show on their site.

Boycott Gamespot videos, or Gamespot alltogether, until they’ve removed all war propaganda and posted an official apology.

Until that happens (right after their hell freezes over or whatever) you could always use some other sites instead;

Game Trailers
or just make a quick search, I bet you’ll find several review sites.

regards,
One who once liked Gamespot

Barefoot Spirit (blog)

I decided to add a new section to the site named “Barefoot Spirit” which currently is mostly an experiment. I’m still a newbie but with some googling and some guesswork, as well as a cup of luck and a whole lot of patience, I’m trying to enhance my site and make it look good. WordPress allows for a lot of tweaks and stuff and plugins, and theer are a lot of documentation and information out there. I’m glad I moved here from Blogger.

The new Barefoot Spirit (previously called “Wallpapers”) section currently shows 4 wallpapers I’ve thrown together, all in 1600×1200 resolution. The first one was a successful experiment with an old photo of my feet as I was relaxing in bed after a day’s barefooting in the city, and some photoshopping. I like using simple tools to reach my result and this experiment, in my own humble opinion, looks gorgeous. It’s a mix of a warm sunset in some fantasy world on an old amiga or commodore 64. I kept playing with the effect and the process and came up with 3 other pictures. The first image also inspired me to the theme of my site. It’s… kind of original, I must say. And it’s very me, as well. I love to be barefoot, and love others who can be barefoot as well – for me that’s a sign of being self confident, down to earth and free in spirit. And I’m no fetishist, actually, despite what many may think. Then again, people think lots of things about me, and I can’t really do anything more about that than to shrug and move on. See this new section as a tribute to spring, and a sort of celebration to my first full day of shoelessness this year (March the 5th)!

Some may think it’s strange or odd, heck – even my closest friends think it’s a bit weird – but why should I hold back really, I ask myself. Time runs by constantly, and I’m going to spend it doing things I like, being myself, as should you. If you would ask me a couple of years ago, I’d probably fold for the pressure and conform. What a boring and pointless life that would be, I say now. So, moving along… hm…

I’ll probably extend the Wallpapers section with more barefoot related images. I’m thinking of taking pictures of others’ feet as well, in relaxed and incomplicated positions and situations. Dangling from a bridge, or up in the air while laying on your stomach, or calmly walking a warm summer day on a trail in the forest while looking at the trees and clouds. First, it’s nice with variation and I’d love to spread “barefooting spirit” as much as I can, and second… it’s far more easy to take pictures of others than to twist your body twice as much as you should and get a good shot… ;)

I personally liked the blue-white image called “Feet of Praise“; sort of “reaching” to the skies. Difficult as it is to take photos of one’s own feet and having had no chance to ask my hubby do it for me, I ended up with that one, but would love to do retakes on it. Preferably using other people as models though. Not that this matters; I should just add that I’m not religious, but like the theme anyway.

The “GoldDangle” image, showing legs hanging down… is actually me sitting on my knees. Yes I know, it’s cheating, but I believe that it’s the results that count. I wanted a blueish watery reflection look at it but after an hour, not finding the right contrast and blending, I settled for a more golden/red/lava look. I kind of like red colors.

The “ChalkFeet” is a simple remix of a simple photo, simply put. Simple enough to put as print on a t-shirt someday.

The “GreenPaws” should really just speak for itself.

As I said, I hope to put up more such images in the future, when I have time…. but no fetish stuff, ever. There’s enough of that on the web for those interested.

New links

I’ve added a few links in the Links section that I’ve found very interesting recently. Two blogs that focus onan open minded view on sexuality, from a mostly Swedish point of view, allthough most arguments they use in their debates are rather universal. I must add that these blogs are in Swedish.

Don’t Pet The Dog – one of the voices of Zoophilia
Svensk Sexualpolitik Idag – covers many sorts of paraphilia and discusses many subjects you’re not allowed to discuss, according to one frighteningly large amount of people

Anyhow; if you’re skilled in Swedish you should check those two links out.

All voices in these debates must be heard. It’s common that when it comes to sexual minorities, everybody except those involved, those most experienced, get to speak. Those it involves are usually silenced, to say the least. How come anti-zoophiles, for example, are so prone to silence zoophiles from speaking? If they are so sure that they are right, what is the risk in letting those defending zoophilia speak? I’m personally using a open commenting system for my blog, and I’ve always done that. Anyone can comment, and I won’t delete comments just because someone thinks differently (I do have non-flaming rules though). I have never deleted one single comment, either, to which I of course can offer no other proof than my word (and perhaps logs, if such exist, from blogger and wordpress). It is interesting. Not even my most fiery opponents on other open forums have bothered (dared?) commenting any of my blog posts. I’m just speculating now of course, but I can’t help but conclude that most of them need their army of shoulder-patters to back them up when their arguments fail… which they usually do. I guess this, a more isolated blog, is deep and dangerous waters for them as their insults and hate won’t count or have the same effect here. They like to humiliate people, and that’s it. They like to show their hate, and come together under it. Understandably, I guess, since belonging is an important element in most of our lives. Sad though that hate and narrowmindedness should be many people’s common interests…

I’ve also added some tags and stuff in order to spread my blog around this huge dark and messy web. I update seldomly, which means my blog won’t be “pinged” that often, which in turn means that many blog listings will “forget” about my blog, and therefore I need other means to keep it active. If you like what I write, then feel free to link to it from your own blog or site, or simply spread the word.

Same game, different packaging

Namely the probably most promising genre in the world right now when it comes to games – MMORPGs (Massive Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game). So many things can be done, so many new opportunities of game play where you can be solo or play with many people at once. Strangers, friends alike. Character progression, equipping your character, modifications, customizations, being unique among a horde of other players. Some games do some of those things better than others.

EVE Online offers quite some customization for your “character” visible for others, but all customization ends up as a simple tiny portrait. On the other hand, if offers a rather complex skill progression, marketing system and combat. World of Warcraft offers remarkably little when it comes to customizating your character – either you get the best items or you suck. You don’t decide what items you want, the game developers decide that for you. Guild Wars offer almost no customization at all, just a few different costumes to choose from, which all look rather pretty but you’ll end up looking much the same as everybody else anyway, except for the look of your super hero cape. Then we have City of Heroes, which really makes it possible for you to look unique, and as there are no different weapons or armors in the game, you can choose to look as buff or thin, evil or fairy-like you want.The reason why I mention the customization part of MMOs first is that it’s a big thing. Progression, also known as “leveling up”, and customizing your character with new skills and/or items, is a really important element in an MMO to make you feel unique among all the other players… and to show off how cool you are that have gotten all those hard to reach skills and items. Competition.

There is, though, the other large part of an MMO, or of any game really – the game play. What do you do in the game the majority of the time? Mostly, it’s about fighting. In most games the only way to progress and make your character stronger is to fight, and in the absolute majority of MMOs, everything you do when you’re not fighting is preparations for future fights. Crafting in games oftenly produce armor or buff items (such as foods, ammunition, etc) that improve your fighting. It’s a rather simple circle of life, so to speak. The game play is the core part of any game. It’s what you do in the game.


How come most MMO games have the exact same (or extremely similar) gameplay? I mentioned some games with very variying amounts of customization, where they really stand out as unique in the way they work, but why do all those games use the exact same core game play? To put it really simple; most MMO’s out there make use of a “select a target and perform actions upon it”-system. In World of Warcraft, you select your target, and perform actions (skills and spells) on it. In EVE Online, you target a ship and then you tell your ship’s modules (guns and devices) to do something to that target. In City of Heroes, you select your target and perform actions and skills on that target. In Lineage 2, it’s the same thing. In Guild Wars, the same, and the list grows long. Few games really stand out as different. An example could possibly be Neocron 2, which is a MMOFPS, where you have to point your weapon to try to hit your opponents, which really is a fresh air as it involves some aiming skills… but sadly, it’s a rather unknown game and thus haven’t got a massive pool of players. Among all the big titles of MMOs out there, there really are no (to my knowledge at the time of this blog entry) games that use anything other than the “select target and perform actions on it”-system.

Of course, a big reason to this sort of game play is (or have been) that it allows for a sort of illusion of action while it’s rather light on bandwidth. You select your target and perform actions. You select the troll, press the key for your fireball spell, and a simple calculation occurs: Is the troll in range, and in sight, then roll a dice to see if you hit or not. Compare that to a modern FPS, where you can launch a grenade. It flies in an arch and you nor the game knows if it’ll hit anything until it actually hits something. More tests have to be done, more data needs to be sent over the network, and the location of the grenade itself will become important to all players. In a game like World of Warcraft, it’s not important where the fireball is. The game already knows if the ball will hit or not and how much damage it will inflict. The representation of a flying fireball in those kinds of games is merely a pretty effect, a sort of timer to show how much time it’s left until the target loses health, and no matter how long you run or how much you try to evade, the fireball will still home in on you.

But, is this the only type of game play you can think of, that doesn’t require much bandwidth? Hello, look at Battlefield 2 or 2142, where 64 players can fight it out in tanks and helicopters and on foot at the same time on the same rather small area. Projectiles, homing rockets, explosions, particles, air-strikes. Sure, it suffers from lag now and then but it’s still rather rare if you have a good internet connection. And 64 players is usually more people than you’ll ever see at the same time in a zone in an MMORPG. So why don’t we see any Battlefield-like MMOs out there, where you point your gun and shoot, instead of select your target and then press the “shoot at target”-button? The latter has almost no interactivity or skill. What is it that game developers are so afraid of? To NOT be like World of Warcraft? Sad. Ok, many MMOs before World of Warcraft had the exact same game play so it’s not completely WoW’s fault, but it seems that every new MMO strives to copy them. Just look at Warhammer Online – they could’ve chosen a new game play, and their sci-fi future theme but… no. They choose to make a humorless copy of World of Warcraft. Great job. Hope you’ll die fast so that game developers and publishers realize that it’s time to do something new, to be creative.

Personally I think World of Warcraft is a great game. It’s got seriously thought-through game design and an easy to use and very dynamic interface. It’s got plenty to do and plenty of people to do it with. What I’m trying to say is; stop making copies of it, especially the washed out game play system. Many people have come to think that MMORPG stands for World of Warcraft, that they must have dragons and dwarves and elves, swords and axes, targetting and a row of action buttons and skills. And certainly, World of Warcraft stole mercilessly from other current games but they perfected what they stole and made it their own, which is far better than to just steal without knowing what you steal or how what you steal will work in your game (and far far far better than not stealing something that probably works better than anything you could come up with, with is what Blizzard probably did with World of Warcraft).

So, what about the First Person Shooter (FPS) genre? Real-Time Strategy (RTS)? Card games? Racing games? (Ok, Auto Assault dies in a month apparently, but it’s rather niched towards people who like strange cars with lots of guns mounted on them) …or Harvest Moon-like games? Sports?

Save us from boredoom. Please.
(by hiring this guy as game designer)

Oh, and I have to add another rant… I’m so damn tired of game developers calling their games MMOs just because they have pretty graphical lobby’s where players can meet up, to then go into completely instanced dungeons. Instanced dungeons mean that when a group of players enter the dungeon, they will get a private and isolated version of that dungeon where noone outside their “party” may enter. However, others may enter the same dungeon, but they’ll also get private and isolated versions of it. To clarify what I mean with pretty lobby’s I’ll give some examples. Guild Wars call themselves an MMO, just because you can run around in towns to meet people but you’ll need to get into an instanced dungeon to fight. Look at Diablo 2 – you have a lobby where you meet up with people, you chat with them and decide to meet up on a server to play, which will act as an instanced dungeon. Is Diablo 2 an MMO? Well, they don’t call themselves one. Battlefield 2142 doesn’t call themselves an MMO, even though the amount of players on one server there is enormous compared to the amount of players at the same time on a battlefield in Guild Wars, for example. So, does MMO mean any game with many players that play online? Then I’d say that Internet Hearts (Microsoft) is an MMO, since probably very many play it and they play online. Oh… and it has no subscription fee…


Images: Screenshots (in order: City of Heroes, World of Warcraft, Guild Wars, World of Warcraft, Windows XP games) – images currently broken due to recent site move

Bare Feet

I can’t understand why the majority of people today deny themselves a whole sense, by putting on socks and shoes, and wearing them almost constantly. Don’t they remember how it once felt to be barefoot, running in the grass, feeling the cool mud between their toes?

The sole of the foot has the highest (or maybe it was the second highest) concentration of pressure receptors on your entire body. Not even your hands has the same concentration. And, considering the feet were undoubtedly made to stay barefoot and move us through life, it’s not really that surprising. We need to see where we’re going, but still keep our eyes unoccupied so they can be used to look at other things. Our feet are perfect; they feel everything, and if not completely abused by shoes, they’ll feel anything that might be dangerous and act accordingly and put less weight on that particular spot, and so on. Two of our most important extremities. With so many muscles, with supreme shock absorption unsurpassable by any shoes, part of a system of bones, tendons and muscles stretching up through our legs, and our backs, with so many receptors to sense the ground and temperature of the surrounding leading the body to compensate accordingly…

…and people confine them in socks and shoes. Stubbornly so, because some who even stops to listen to all the negative sides of wearing shoes, and the positive sides of being barefoot, they take pride in wearing shoes, and almost get deeply hurt if someone were to question them.

But – I’m not going to rant about all the good sides of being barefoot and all the many side effects of wearing shoes, like flat feet, back problems, knee problems, athletes foot, fungus, and so on… others do it so much better than me.

What I wanted to say with this post is to try to explain the indescribable feeling of having taken a long walk outside a hot summer day like this, on scorching asphalt, through cool damp grass, in stores on strangely textured carpets, on ice-cold stone floors, grasping grass with your toes, touching and feeling everything and anything, from cold to hot, from smooth to rough, from grass to rocks. Then, coming home, and then have all those sensations echoing for hours. It’s almost a childish feeling, a feeling of simple and pure shameless joy.

Such a simple thing to do. Yet so few do it.

 

It’s far less unhygienic than shoes, it’s not smelly, it’s not disgusting. What is disgusting, unhygienic and smelly are all the bacteria that marinates in people’s shoes. What is terrible is that people actually think that shoes are better than bare feet. They aren’t. Sure, sometimes we need protection against hazardous things like chemicals in laboratories and such, but in our day-to-day lives, that’s not necessary. Shoes don’t let your feet’s muscles work as they should, which affect your knees and legs, and in extension also your back. You pound down heels first like your legs were hammers and your feet were some sort of lifeless lumps, and then you wonder why your knees hurt and your back is stiff? Bah.

So simple to take of your shoes. Such a wonderful feeling. Yet so few dare fight the norms of society just a tiny bit.

For more facts and sources, mythbusting and information, please visit www.barefooters.org.

Check out the Barefoot Spirit section related to this post, with tasteful and remixed photos and wallpapers of our two main links to the earth beneath us.

EDIT: An interesting Japanese study showing that what I already know; that no socks/shoes lead to the body getting better at raising its’ temperature and keeping warm, and another study showing that barefoot children learn to avoid dangerous obstacles better and to keep cleaner than shod children.

EDIT 2008-05-13: A very interesting and straight forward article about how we are wrecking our feet with every step we take. Or rather, that you take – I’m fine.


Images: personal photos